summary
A proposal for a comprehensive response
Editorial context
This page paraphrases the historical letter rather than reproducing its wording. It records a policy argument made shortly after the September 11 attacks; inclusion in the does not imply endorsement.
The letter supported the administration's stated intention to organize a sustained international response to terrorism and argued that U.S. policy should extend beyond identifying those responsible for the September 11 attacks.
Its authors described military action, diplomacy, financial controls and cooperation with other governments as parts of a single strategy. They also argued that the United States should retain the capacity to meet security commitments in other regions while conducting the campaign.
Afghanistan and al-Qaeda
The document identified Osama bin Laden and his network as an immediate priority. It advocated military action in Afghanistan and substantial assistance for Afghan forces opposing the Taliban. The stated objective was to disrupt the network and deny it a protected operating base.
Iraq
The letter argued that U.S. strategy should address the Iraqi government even if no direct connection to the September 11 attacks were established. It urged military and financial backing for Iraqi opposition groups, the creation of a protected area from which they could operate and readiness to support that commitment with American forces.
Hezbollah, Iran and Syria
The authors called for Hezbollah to be included in the wider campaign because of its record of attacks against American and allied interests. They urged the administration to press Iran and Syria to end military, political and financial support for the organization and to consider further measures if those governments did not comply.
Israel and the Palestinian Authority
The letter advocated continued U.S. support for Israel's security and argued that the Palestinian Authority should prevent attacks originating from territory under its control and detain those planning them. It recommended withholding additional American assistance until such action was taken.
Defense spending and international cooperation
The authors maintained that a sustained campaign would require a substantial increase in defense funding. They argued that the United States needed enough capacity both to pursue the campaign and to protect its interests elsewhere.
The concluding section acknowledged that military measures alone would not be sufficient. It called for diplomatic work to secure help from other countries and for the use of economic and financial instruments alongside military policy.
About the signatories
The original document was signed by William Kristol and a larger group of policy commentators and former officials. This editorial version omits the full roster while preserving the letter's collective character and principal policy positions.