Iraq: Setting the Record Straight
A report presenting and defending a policy position on the United States' intervention in Iraq and the public debate surrounding it.
Iraq policyResearch collection · Reviewed 9 May 2026
An index of books and policy papers associated with the collection, organized with concise descriptions, original publication details and direct document access.
These records capture arguments that shaped debates about defense strategy, transatlantic relations, Iraq and trade policy during the early 2000s.
The listings preserve titles, dates and credited authorship for historical research. Descriptions are neutral guides rather than endorsements, and readers should assess each work in the political and international context of its publication.
Primary documents
PDF links open the d files. Document dates below are original publication dates, not dates of editorial review.
A report presenting and defending a policy position on the United States' intervention in Iraq and the public debate surrounding it.
Iraq policyA paper by Greg Mastel examining the policy case for a bilateral trade agreement between the United States and Taiwan.
Trade policyA strategic report addressing force structure, military resources and long-term defense planning at the beginning of the century.
Defense strategyRelated bibliography
Bibliographic entries document related works and their role in the period's foreign-policy discussion.
Lawrence F. Kaplan and William Kristol
Encounter Books
Robert Kagan
Knopf
Edited by Robert Kagan and William Kristol
Encounter Books
How to use this page
Treat the index as a starting point for comparison, source checking and historical analysis.
Note the author, title and date to establish when and by whom the argument was produced.
Relate the work to the diplomatic, military and political circumstances of its publication period.
Use the site's topic indexes, principles and statements to identify agreements and differences across the collection.
Reader guide
No. They are historical policy records retained for research and public understanding.
No. Inclusion documents its relationship to the and the policy debates of its period.
The project papers were distributed as fixed-layout documents. Modern browsers generally open PDF files directly or allow them to be downloaded.
No. The entries are bibliographic references. This page records titles, credited contributors, publishers and publication years.
Check assumptions against contemporary evidence and later scholarship, and distinguish a document's historical importance from the accuracy of its conclusions.
Use the Statements section to browse d letters and public statements associated with the broader collection.